|
In the News
Jury Award of $120 Million for Unpaid Overtime
Upheld in Favor of Insurance Claims Representatives
Bell v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 2004 Cal. LEXIS 4135, May
12, 2004. The Court of Appeal affirmed the earlier judgment
that the claims representatives were non-exempt employees since
they were “production workers” and did not meet the
exempt necessary to qualify as exempt administrative employees.
The Appellate Court also held that the trial court had not abused
its discretion in certifying the matter as a class action.
California Supreme Court Holds Employer Strictly
Liable for the Harassment of an Employee By One of its Supervisors.
State Department of Health Services v. Superior Court, 31 Cal.
4th 1026 (2003). Plaintiff suffered physical and verbal harassment
by her supervisor from early 1996 to late 1997. The Court analyzed
the statutory language of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”)
and found that it differed from its federal counterpart Title VII.
As a result, the Court held that “under FEHA, an employer
is strictly liable for all acts of sexual harassment by a supervisor.”
However, the Court also held that employers may limit their damages
by pleading and proving that: (1) the employer took reasonable steps
to prevent and correct the workplace sexual harassment; (2) the
employee unreasonably failed to use the preventive and corrective
measures that the employer provided” and (3) reasonable use
of the employer’s procedures would have prevented at least
some of the harm that the employee suffered.
Whistleblower Claims Under Sarbanes Oxley Corporate
Reform Act of 2002 Held Not to be Exempt from Mandatory Industry
Arbitration.
Boss v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc., 263 F. Supp. 684 (S.D.N.Y.
2003).
Plaintiff argued that because the Act conferred jurisdiction on
the Federal courts to hear whistleblower claims under the act, that
such claims were not to be arbitrated. The district court summarily
rejected plaintiff’s argument stating that “[t]here
is nothing in the text of the statute or the legislative history
of the Sarbanes-Oxley act evincing intent to preempt arbitration
of claims under the Act.
|